He's/She's Only There Because...
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Tokenism.
I'm not a fan of including characters in comics just because they are (perceived as) different than the majority (when guess what, they aren't) due to ethnic background or sexual persuasion or skin color. I think that's ridiculous and that we should be way beyond that now, both in comics and more importantly, in the real world. I think to change the status quo of a character or team or to introduce a new character just to be "politically correct" is nothing more than tokenism, and that's definitely not a good thing.
Let me be clear on this. I have no problems whatsoever with any type of minorities being in comics. Three of my favorite characters are an alien being, a blue skinned chick, and a lesbian, for crying out loud. I don't want you the reader walking away from this thinking I'm a racist moron or prejudicial idiot, because I'm the farthest thing from it. What I'm saying here is I think it's wrong to force a character just because they are a minority.
I think my main problem with a character like John Stewart is the fact that the only reason he's in the current Justice League is because he was in the animated series, and the only reason he was there was because he was African-American. At the time the animated series started, Kyle Rayner was the one and only GL in the entire universe. John was a mentor of sorts to Kyle but no longer a GL in the book (he was actually unable to walk, if I remember correctly). I understand the show wanted to be culturally diverse, and that's fine. Why not bring in Steel? Or Black Lightning? Or any other African-American character that wouldn't have seemed so forced?
Another example is Captain America: Truth: Red, White, and Black. Shoe horning in a "black Captain America" (not my words) that no one outside the black community in the Marvel U knows is ridiculously token, in my opinion. It's borderline offensive to African-Americans, if you ask me.
Look at the Batwoman fiasco as another example. The first and only thing anyone ever said about Batwoman was "Oh my God! DC Comics has a lesbian!". That was all over mainstream media for weeks. And where is she now? Has the character had any impact on the DCU outside of 52, where she was introduced? Has she even been in any DC books since then, outside of a cameo? I certainly haven't seen her. I would love to see her in Birds Of Prey, or in the Batman books. Again, tokenism.
I could go on and on with various examples from both of the big two (and probably the indies), but you get my point by now, I hope. Minority characters have been introduced in much better ways in the past and have thrived (Storm, Spawn, Pied Piper, Northstar), and that's the way it should be. The focus should be on the whole character and their journey, not just the one controversial-in-some-eyes facet of the character.
I can only hope that sometime soon, tokenism, be it in comics or in real life, will become a thing of the past.

